Who are you looking for?

Install Famoose

Keep Famoose on your home screen or desktop for easy access.

Open this site in Chrome or Edge and look for Install app in the browser menu or address bar. If no install option appears, you can bookmark Famoose instead.

Famoose.co
Appearance
Text size
Page width
Colour
Scientific milestone

The DNA double helix

Explaining how DNA's molecular structure could carry and copy genetic information.

When
1953
Where
Cambridge and London, Britain
Modern molecular illustration of a section of the DNA double helix.
Modern molecular illustration of a section of the DNA double helix.

The double-helix model connected the structure of DNA with heredity. James Watson and Francis Crick developed the model using chemical and experimental evidence, including X-ray work by Rosalind Franklin and Maurice Wilkins.

01

Background

A molecular question

Researchers knew that understanding heredity required explaining the physical organisation of genetic material. Evidence came from several laboratories rather than one isolated experiment.[1]

02

What happened

  1. 1953

    Model published

    Watson and Crick's paper appeared in Nature on 25 April.[1]

  2. 1962

    Nobel recognition

    Watson, Crick and Wilkins shared the medicine prize for work on nucleic-acid structure and information transfer.[1]

03

Impact & evidence

1953

Evidence behind the model

X-ray diffraction work by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling helped constrain the possible shape of DNA. The 1953 double-helix model brought experimental evidence together with chemical reasoning about how its components could fit. Complementary base pairing also suggested how genetic information could be copied. Reducing the discovery to a single photograph or a sudden flash of inspiration obscures the experimental work and the question of how unpublished results were shared.[3]

04

Aftermath & legacy

Credit and discovery

Franklin's experimental contribution is essential to this history. The model became a foundation for molecular biology, while accounts of its discovery continue to examine access to data and recognition.[1]

A structure opened further questions

Knowing DNA’s shape did not by itself explain every step between a gene and an organism’s characteristics. It gave researchers a physical framework for investigating replication and the storage of biological information. Franklin’s contribution has since become central to reassessments of how credit was distributed among the scientists involved.[4]

Sources & image credits (4)
  1. Nobel Prize — What is life?
  2. Nobel Prize — Cells, nerves and genes
  3. nature.com — historical account
  4. nature.com — historical account

84user adapting file originally uploaded by Richard Wheeler ( Zephyris ) at en.wikipedia; CC BY-SA 3.0; via Wikimedia Commons. Image source ↗

Related historical cases